USDA Harvest Boxes
It's no secret that I loathe the Orange One. I don't dislike Trump's supporters. I like America. I respect the Office of the President. I'm Republican. My problem rests squarely with The Donald.
I've sneered at his infantile antics since the 80s. I detested everything he stood for - greed, the sexual objectification of women, and excess during a time when the average American was suffering due to a recession. I growled at the way he treated the Trump Frump (hat-tip to Berke Breathed and Bloom County, there). His behavior back then disgusted me.
His current behavior isn't anything new but is magnified ten-fold thanks to his ability to promote himself easily on Twitter. Everything he does is asinine.
His current behavior isn't anything new but is magnified ten-fold thanks to his ability to promote himself easily on Twitter. Everything he does is asinine.
Thus we come to another asinine idea put forth by Trump and promoted by his administration: Harvest Boxes.
Harvest boxes are aimed at saving $120 billion
in SNAP over the next 10 years by giving low-income families packages
of shelf-stable foods selected by the government to replace their food
stamp benefits. "It's like Blue Apron" for poor people! What moron thought this up?
Initially, it wasn't Trump. He never has original ideas. No, this idea has been used in the past and resulted in disaster.
Since 1977, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has bought nonperishable foods to distribute on Indian reservations and nearby rural areas as part of the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations. The program was designed as an alternative to SNAP for low-income Native Americans living in remote areas without easy access to grocery stores. The food boxes delivered were filled with canned, shelf-stable foods like peanut butter, meats and vegetables, powdered eggs and milk.
The effects of this kind of government commodities-based diet can be seen all around Indian country, says Jernigan, now a University of Oklahoma researcher who studies the impacts of food environments on Native American health. "There's even a name for it — it's called 'commod bod.' That's what we call it because it makes you look a certain way when you eat these foods."
The name, she says, is a joke, but the health implications of this kind of diet are anything but funny. American Indians and Alaska Natives are at least twice as likely as whites to have Type 2 diabetes, and they have 1 1/2 times the rate of obesity as non-Hispanic whites, according to the government statistics.
After the program began in the 1970s, Jernigan says, "you started to see high consumption of these packaged and shelf-stable canned foods — nothing fresh, no fresh vegetables, foods high in sodium, fat and sugar. And you see the rates of these preventable diseases skyrocket."
Those government-provided food boxes also contained something else: stigma, says Joe Van Alstine, a citizen of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians in Michigan.
Source: How Might Trump's Food Box Plan Affect Health? Native Americans Know All Too Well, Maria Godoy
I've heard various arguments in favor of the program. Most are promoted by ignorant people. The assumption is that poor people use SNAP to buy lobster, steak, and junk food. They should be grateful that the government is willing to give them free "healthy" food. Poor people just bitter because they are unappreciative of the tax dollars wasted on them. They want more than they already get.
First of all, I don't know of many people that use SNAP to buy expensive foods. Yes, I'm sure some do. That's on them. The majority use the benefits to buy milk, bread, inexpensive meats, and staples. They have to stretch those items because the allotment never really covers a full month of food.
Secondly, many of those "unappreciative people" put years of labor into it. It's their taxes. They can't help it if they were laid off, or if industry relocated to other countries. It's not their fault that coal mines closed and fisheries had to thin their ranks. They can't be held accountable for being elderly and having nothing to live on after two recessions. They would work, if they could, and many do. They simply can't earn enough and thus they qualify for benefits. Stop begrudging them! These are your friends, your neighbors, your family. These people could be your child's teacher, the young family of a cop new to the force, or even me. They could be you someday.
That brings me to this brilliant piece of work: Sonny Perdue. Mr Perdue is the Secretary of Agriculture. You can read all about him in his bio, but here's a little snippet:
"[He] will prioritize customer service every day for American taxpayers and consumers. They will expect, and have every right to demand, that their government conduct the people’s business efficiently, effectively, and with the utmost integrity... As Americans expect a safe and secure food supply, USDA will continue to serve in the critical role of ensuring the food we put on the table to feed our families meets the strict safety standards we’ve established. Food security is a key component of national security, because hunger and peace do not long coexist."
As Secretary, he is at the top of the USDA, the agency rabidly promoting Trump's Harvest Boxes program.
Mr Perdue, you spout conflicting messages. Where is the integrity in pushing food onto people that they may not be able to consume due to dietary or religious issues? How effective is a program whereupon people will discard what they can't eat? It's wasteful, sir.
That brings me to the boxes themselves. What can we expect? We've been given a little insight.
Has anyone ever looked into how much food the seniors utilize from their "food gift"? My parents have used a food bank. They throw out half of it because they can't eat it. Most of it is dented cans and products at the end of their shelf life. Powdered milk, powdered eggs, high-sodium canned veg, high-gluten pasta, heavy breads, products loaded with MSG. This diet is fine for a college kid physically capable of metabolizing it. It won't work for geriatric people, nor for children and expecting mothers. I wouldn't be able to eat any of it. This diet would kill me.
To people like Trump, food is something taken for granted. To the poor, food is a balancing act. You have to stretch what you have using the healthiest things you can afford. This means buying bulk tomatoes and stewing them, then freezing them. It means buying milk on sale and freezing it. It means figuring out how many eggs you might need in a week, and adjusting your menu if the carton is too expensive.
To give you an idea of just how much SNAP provides... at the lowest income tier, a household of 3 with a net income of $1,500 must subtract $450 (30 percent of $1,500) from the maximum allotment for their household, which is $511 per month. They then subtract the $450 from the $511 maximum. The household will receive a food stamp allotment of $61 for the month.
$61. That's it. That's what you use to buy your food. For 3 people. And Trump wants to take half of that and turn it into food they can't consume. That leaves them $30.50 for milk, eggs, meat. I wonder what he's having for dinner tonight. I bet it costs more than $30.50 per person.
What SNAP is supposed to do:
Mr Perdue, you spout conflicting messages. Where is the integrity in pushing food onto people that they may not be able to consume due to dietary or religious issues? How effective is a program whereupon people will discard what they can't eat? It's wasteful, sir.
That brings me to the boxes themselves. What can we expect? We've been given a little insight.
"The idea was modeled after the Commodity Supplemental Food Program, which provides boxes of shelf-stable food to about 600,000 low-income senior citizens. USDA sends these goods to food banks and other nonprofits who then sort it, pack it in boxes and figure out how to distribute the packages to senior citizens in need." - Trump’s ‘harvest box’ plan met with boos
Has anyone ever looked into how much food the seniors utilize from their "food gift"? My parents have used a food bank. They throw out half of it because they can't eat it. Most of it is dented cans and products at the end of their shelf life. Powdered milk, powdered eggs, high-sodium canned veg, high-gluten pasta, heavy breads, products loaded with MSG. This diet is fine for a college kid physically capable of metabolizing it. It won't work for geriatric people, nor for children and expecting mothers. I wouldn't be able to eat any of it. This diet would kill me.
To people like Trump, food is something taken for granted. To the poor, food is a balancing act. You have to stretch what you have using the healthiest things you can afford. This means buying bulk tomatoes and stewing them, then freezing them. It means buying milk on sale and freezing it. It means figuring out how many eggs you might need in a week, and adjusting your menu if the carton is too expensive.
To give you an idea of just how much SNAP provides... at the lowest income tier, a household of 3 with a net income of $1,500 must subtract $450 (30 percent of $1,500) from the maximum allotment for their household, which is $511 per month. They then subtract the $450 from the $511 maximum. The household will receive a food stamp allotment of $61 for the month.
$61. That's it. That's what you use to buy your food. For 3 people. And Trump wants to take half of that and turn it into food they can't consume. That leaves them $30.50 for milk, eggs, meat. I wonder what he's having for dinner tonight. I bet it costs more than $30.50 per person.
What SNAP is supposed to do:
___________________________________
A follow up to this:
They've released a nifty pamphlet outlining the program.
USDA America’s Harvest Box
“USDA America’s Harvest Box is a bold, innovative approach to providing nutritious food to people who need assistance feeding themselves and their families - and all of it is home grown by American farmers and producers. It maintains the same level of food value as SNAP participants currently receive, provides states flexibility in administering the program, and is responsible to the taxpayers.”
- Secretary Sonny Perdue
USDA America’s Harvest Box
- Under the USDA America’s Harvest Box proposal, all Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participating households receiving $90 per month or more in benefits will receive a package of nutritious, 100 percent U.S. grown and produced food. Approximately 16.4 million households, or about 81 percent of SNAP households would be impacted by this proposal.
- The amount of food received per household would be scaled to the overall size of the household’s SNAP allotment, ultimately representing about half of their benefits. SNAP participants would receive domestically-sourced and produced food in lieu of a portion of their SNAP benefits.
- USDA would utilize a model similar to that currently used to distribute USDA Foods to other nutritionassistance programs to provide staple, shelf-stable foods (such as shelf-stable milk, juice, grains, ready-eat-cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans, canned meat, poultry or fish, and canned fruits and vegetables) to SNAP households at approximately half the retail cost.
- This proposal creates a new approach to nutrition assistance that combines retail-based SNAP benefits with delivery of USDA America’s Harvest Boxes supporting the President’s leadership on Buy American. This proposal is cost-effective, enhances the integrity of SNAP, and provides for states’ flexibility in administration of the program.
- The remainder of the household’s benefits will still be provided via the current Electronic Benefit Transfer card.
- This proposal would save $129.2 billion over the ten-year period between Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 and FY2028. This estimate accounts for about $2.5 billion annually in additional administrative funds for states.
- USDA currently purchases a wide variety of food for several nutrition assistance programs, including the National School Lunch Program, the Commodity Supplemental Food Program, The Emergency Food Assistance Program, and the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations.
- States will be given substantial flexibility to distribute these food benefits to participants. States can distribute these boxes through existing infrastructure, partnerships, and/or directly to residences through commercial and/or retail delivery services.
"Secretary Sonny Perdue wants to hear from you about the customer service you receive from USDA. Your comments and suggestions will help us find better ways to meet your customer service needs." You can voice your opinion of Perdue's bullshit here: https://www.usda.gov/tellsonny or call 1-877-508-8364, Monday through Friday, 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. CT.
Comments
Post a Comment